Abstract

School academic optimism is an internal factor that plays an important role in a range of school outcomes. In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on the antecedents of school academic optimism. Previous studies have concluded that leadership has an important impact on school academic optimism. However, the wholistic effect of distributed leadership and meaningful work on school academic optimism has not been sufficiently researched. Therefore, in the current study, we tested the model we had developed to explore the direct and indirect relations among distributed leadership, meaningful work, and school academic optimism both at the teacher level and school level. The data were gathered from 813 teachers working at 78 state primary schools located in 12 regions in Türkiye. We used multilevel structural equation model analysis to test the model we had developed. The results show that meaningful work is a significant factor in the relationship between distributed leadership and school academic optimism. This result contributes to the literature that focuses on the antecedents of school academic optimism. Based on the study results, it is recommended to develop and implement policies that will strengthen schools and give school leaders more authority to produce effective outcomes.

Keywords: Distributed leadership, Meaningful work, School academic optimism, Teacher

References

  1. Akyürek, M. İ., & Bülbül, A. E. (2024). The relationship between distributed leadership and academic optimism: A meta-analysis study. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1-16. doi:10.1080/15700763.2024.2312997
  2. Amels, J., Krüger, M. L., Suhre, C. J. M., & van Veen, K. (2021). The relationship between primary school leaders’ utilization of distributed leadership and teachers’ capacity to change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 732-749. doi:10.1177%2F1741143220915921
  3. Arnold, K. A., Barling, N., Turner, J., Kelloway, E. K., & McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 193-203. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.193
  4. Bakker, A., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. (2003). Dual processes at work in a call centre: An application of the job demands-resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(4), 393-417. doi:10.1080/13594320344000165
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  6. Börü, N., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2021). Comparing the relationships between school principals’ leadership types and teachers’ academic optimism. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(4), 1-19. doi:10.1080/13603124.2021.1889035
  7. Ceylan, E., Özdoğan Özbal, E., Sever, M., & Boyacı, A. (2020). Türkiye’deki öğretmen ve okul yöneticilerinin görüşleri, öğretim koşulları: TALIS 2018 öğretmen ve okul yöneticileri yanıtları analizi. Ankara: Millî Egitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  8. Chalofsky, N. (2003). An emerging construct or meaningful work. Human Resources Development International, 6(1), 69-83. doi:10.1080/1367886022000016785
  9. Chang, I. H. (2011). A study of the relationships between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 491-515. doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.614945
  10. Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2018). Teachers’ perceived autonomy support and adaptability: An investigation employing the job demands-resources model as relevant to workplace exhaustion, disengagement, and commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 125-136. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.015
  11. Çoban, D., & Demirtaş, H. (2011). Okulların akademik iyimserlik düzeyi ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığı arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(3), 317-348.
  12. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512.
  13. Demirtaş, Ö., Hannah, S. T., Gök, K., Arslan, A., & Capar, N. (2017). The moderated influence of ethical leadership, via meaningful work, on followers’ engagement, organizational identification, and envy. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 183-199. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2907-7
  14. Development Agencies. (2023) Kalkınma planlamasında istatistiki bölge birimleri sınıflandırması. Retrieved from https://ka.gov.tr/sayfalar/kalkinma-planlamasinda-istatistiki-bolge-birimleri-siniflandirmasi--24
  15. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-24.
  16. Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
  17. Feng, F. I., & Chen, W. L. (2019). The effect of principals’ social justice leadership on teachers’ academic optimism in Taiwan. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1245-1264. doi:10.1177/0013124518785438
  18. Fleiss, J. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley.
  19. Fouché, E., S. S. Rothmann, & Van der Vyver, C. (2017). Antecedents and outcomes of meaningful work among school teachers. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 43(1), 1-10. doi:10.4102/sajip.v43i0.1398
  20. Frémeaux, S., & Pavageau, B. (2022). Meaningful leadership: How can leaders contribute to meaningful work?. Journal of Management Inquiry, 31(1), 54-66, doi:10.1177/1056492619897126
  21. Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683-702. doi:10.1177/00131610021969164
  22. Göçen, A., & Terzi, R. (2019). Meaningful work scale for educational organizations. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(3), 1487-1512.
  23. Gramaje, J. A. D., & Buenviaje, J. T. (2023). The roles of middle leaders in reinforcing academic optimism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. doi:10.1177/17411432231201488
  24. Granziera, H., Collie, R., & Martin, A. (2021). Understanding teacher wellbeing through job demands-resources theory. In C. F. Mansfield (Ed.), Cultivating teacher resilience: International approaches, applications and impact (pp. 229-244). Springer.
  25. Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317-338. doi:10.1177/0263211X000283006
  26. Gronn, P. (2010). Where to next for educational leadership?. In T. Bush, L. Bell, & D. Middlewood (Eds.), The principles of educational leadership and management (pp. 70-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  27. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
  28. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  29. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142. doi:10.1108/09578231111116699
  30. Hallinger, P, & Murphy, J. F. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328-355. doi:10.1086/443853
  31. Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. London: University of Chicago Press.
  32. Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility?. School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313-324. doi:10.1080/1363243032000112801
  33. Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2002). Leadership in schools facing challenging circumstances. Management in Education, 16(1), 10-13.
  34. Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337-347. doi:10.1007/s10833-007-9048-4
  35. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2014). Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 653-681. doi:10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0097
  36. Hill, N. S., Seo, M. G., Kang, J. H., & Taylor, M. S. (2012). Building employee commitment to change across organizational levels: The influence of hierarchical distance and direct managers’ transformational leadership. Organization Science, 23(3), 758-777. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0662
  37. Hirschi, A. (2012). Callings and work engagement: Moderated mediation model of work meaningfulness, occupational identity, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 59(3), 479-485. doi:10.1037/a0028949
  38. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Hong, F. Y. (2017). Antecedent and consequence of school academic optimism and teachers’ academic optimism model. Educational Studies, 43(2), 165-185. doi:10.1080/03055698.2016.1248902
  40. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425-446. doi:10.3102/00028312043003425
  41. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  42. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Keer, H.V. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the source of the leadership function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 728-77. doi:10.1177/0013161X11402065
  43. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 1013-1034. doi:10.1177/0013164409344490
  44. Karataş, E., & Özdemir, M. (2022). Examining the relationship between meaningful work and job engagement. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(3), 676-698. doi:10.30831/akukeg.1053090
  45. Kılınç, A. Ç. (2013). The relationship between individual teacher academic optimism and school climate. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(3), 621-634.
  46. Kulophas, D., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership that matters: Creating cultures of academic optimism that support teacher learning in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 605-627. doi:10.1108/JEA-12-2019-0222
  47. Kulophas, D., Hallinger, P., Ruengtrakul, A., & Wongwanich., S. (2018). Exploring the effects of authentic leadership on academic optimism and teacher engagement in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 27-45. doi:10.1108/IJEM-10-2016-0233
  48. Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671-706. doi:10.1177/0013161X10377347
  49. Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 49(3), 430-453. doi:10.1177/1741143220910438
  50. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: toward a micro‐intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387-393. doi:10.1002/job.373
  51. Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2009). Assessing within-group agreement: A critical examination of a random-group resampling approach. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 461-487. doi:10.1177/1094428108317406
  52. Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 374-389. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.07.004
  53. Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Strauss, T., & Sacks, R. (2009). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 214-228. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_5
  54. McGuigan, L., & Hoy, W. K. (2006). Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(3), 203-229. doi:10.1080/15700760600805816
  55. Miller, C. S. (2008). Meaningful work over the life course (Doctoral dissertation). Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA.
  56. Ministry of National Education. (2021). National Education statistics 2021/2022. Retrieved from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=424
  57. Mitchell, R. M., & Tarter, C. J. (2016). A path analysis of the effects of principal professional orientation towards leadership, professional teacher behavior, and school academic optimism on school reading achievement. Societies, 6(1), 1-11. doi:10.3390/soc6010005
  58. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén Publishing.
  59. Oldac, Y. I., & Kondakci, Y. (2020). Multilevel analysis of the relationship between school-level variables and student achievement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 762-780. doi:10.1177/1741143219827303
  60. Özdemir, M. (2008). Eğitim yönetiminde yerelleşme siyasaları. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 41(3), 153-168.
  61. Özdemir, M. (2012). Dağıtımcı liderlik envanterinin türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 4(4), 575-598.
  62. Özdemir, M., & Demircioğlu, E. (2015). Distributed leadership and contract relations: Evidence from Turkish high schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 918-938. doi:10.1177/1741143214543207
  63. Özdemir, M., & Pektaş, V. (2017). Examining the relationship between social justice leadership and school academic optimism according to teachers’ opinions. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(2), 576-601. doi:10.12984/egeefd.328458
  64. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Revi¬ew of Psychology, 63, 539-569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  65. Pradhan, S., & Jena, L. K. (2019). Does meaningful work explains the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour?. Vikalpa, 44(1), 30-40. doi:10.1177/0256090919832434
  66. Pratt, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 309-327). Oakland, CA: Berret-Koehler Publishers.
  67. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  68. Ross, L., Lutfi, G. A., & Hope, W. C. (2016). Distributed leadership and teachers’ affective commitment. NASSP Bulletin, 100(3), 159-169. doi:10.1177/0192636516681842
  69. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. doi:10.1002/job.248
  70. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3-12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  71. Singh, N., & Rangnekar, S. (2016). Relationship between meaningful work and organizational trust: A study of techno-managers in the Indian power sector. In Proceedings of GLOGIFT 16 (pp. 247-255). New Delhi: Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management (GIFT) Publishing.
  72. Skaalvik, E., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611-625. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
  73. Smith, P. A., & Hoy, W. K. (2007). Academic optimism and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(5), 556-568. doi:10.1108/09578230710778196
  74. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150.
  75. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34. doi:10.1080/0022027032000106726
  76. Srivastava, A. P., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Authentic leadership for teacher’s academic optimism: Moderating effect of training comprehensiveness. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(5), 321-344. doi:10.1108/EJTD-12-2015-0096
  77. Tummers, L. G., & Knies, E. (2013). Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 859-868. doi:10.1111/puar.12138
  78. Wagner, C. A., & Dipaola, M. F. (2011). Academic optimism of high school teachers: Its relationship to organizational citizenship behaviors and student achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 21(6), 893-926. doi:10.1177/105268461102100607
  79. Ware, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 303-310. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.5.303-310
  80. Willemse, M., & Deacon, E. (2015). Experiencing a sense of calling: The influence of meaningful work on teachers' work attitudes. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1), 1-9. doi:10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1274
  81. Wu, J. H., & Sheu, T. M. (2015). How to improve academic optimism? An inquiry from the perspective of school resource and investment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 663-674.
  82. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235-244. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
  83. Xu, S., Zhang, H., Dai, Y., Ma, J., & Lyu, L. (2021). Distributed leadership and new generation employees’ proactive behavior: Roles of idiosyncratic deals and meaningfulness of work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(755513), 1-13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755513

Copyright and license

Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite

Özdemir, M., Polat, Ş., Küçükçene, M., Sincer, S., & Aydın Yürükçü, N. (2025). Nexus between Distributed Leadership, Meaningful Work and School Academic Optimism in Turkish Schools: A Multilevel SEM Analysis. Education and Science, 50(222), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2025.13286