Abstract
This research aimed to thematically review the argumentation studies at the K-8 level from 2006 to 2016. Given the criteria ‘the K-8 level and a period of 2006-2016’ for the argumentation studies, relevant databases yielded a total of 73 articles and 9 theses. These studies were exposed to thematically content analysis via such parameters as aim, method/design, sample, data collection, data analysis, subject employed for argumentation, type of used argumentation, argumentation model, general knowledge claim and recommendation. The results indicated that most of the argumentation studies examined the effect of argumentation on student achievement and attitudes towards science. Also, these studies under investigation mostly used experimental research design while generally preferring scales and audio-video records for data collection tools. Moreover, the argumentation activities were mostly developed in ‘physics’ topics and middle school level. The results of the current study suggest to deploy different methods (e.g. argumentation accompanied with gamification) to improve argumentation skills from primary school level.
Keywords: Argumentation, K-8 level, Scientific discourse, Science education, Thematic review
Copyright and license
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to cite
Bağ, H., & Çalık, M. (2017). A Thematic Review of Argumentation Studies at The K-8 Level. Education and Science, 42(190). https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6845